Real-Life Challenges in Manual vs Automation Testing

 Manual and automation testing both have their pros and cons, and knowing when to use each is crucial for the success of any testing strategy.

Challenges of Manual Testing

  1. Time-Consuming: Repetitive tests are labor-intensive, requiring testers to manually execute the same steps over and over.
  2. Human Error: Since manual testing involves human effort, errors are more likely due to fatigue or oversight.
  3. Limited Coverage: Manual tests typically cover fewer scenarios compared to automated tests.

Challenges of Automation Testing

  1. High Initial Setup Cost: Setting up an automation framework and writing test scripts can be time-consuming and requires a skilled workforce.
  2. Flaky Tests: Automated tests may fail due to environmental factors like slow internet or browser configurations.
  3. Maintenance: As applications evolve, automated test scripts need to be updated regularly, which can become a maintenance burden.

When to Choose Manual Testing

  • For exploratory testing or when you're testing new features.
  • When the cost of automation is too high compared to the benefits.

When to Choose Automation Testing

  • For repetitive tasks and regression testing.
  • When you need to test across multiple browsers or environments.

Pro Tip: A balanced approach, where both manual and automated testing are used strategically, often yields the best results.


Do you want to find the right balance between manual and automation testing for your project? Start by identifying repetitive tasks that can be automated and focus manual efforts on new feature exploration and complex scenarios.

To get connect with for more updates, Don't forget to connect with me in linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/aravindhkrishn/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Fix Stale Element Reference Exception in Selenium

How to Use TestNG for Efficient Test Management